Legal Opinion

Fee v. Richmond Manufacturing Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1984No. Civ. 10565PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Raymond and Mabel Fee, filed an appeal to this court from a summary judgment of the district court of Grand Forks County dismissing Pat McGrath, Inc. (McGrath), as a party defendant in the lawsuit. Thereafter, the defendant, Richmond Manufacturing Company (Richmond), filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. We dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

During October 1981, the Fees filed an action in State district court against Richmond and McGrath seeking damages for injuries received by Raymond Fee while using a horizontal boring machine, manufactured by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The State of South Carolina v. James Edward MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  2. Hennebry v. HoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Striegel v. Dakota Hills, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. WynnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United Hospital v. D'AnnunzioNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Cichos v. Dakota Eye Institute, P.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API