Graebner v. James River Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*441ORDER
F. STEELE LANGFORD, United States Magistrate.
Plaintiff Linda Graebner (“Graebner”) moved for a protective order to prevent James River Corporation (“James River”) from taking her deposition a second time. The deposition was noticed for September 27, 1989, shortly before the discovery cutoff. This Magistrate heard the matter on shortened time, October 3, 1989, at 1:30 p.m. The pleadings and argument of counsel having been fully considered, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that James River may not take Graebner’s deposition a second time. James River, in opposing Graebner’s…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Peter Lobb v. United Air Lines, Inc., and the Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Albornoz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Bonneau v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Carroll v. City of StocktonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Dayal v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.