Legal Opinion

Haddad v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided November 17, 1993No. 05-92-00470-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MALONEY, Justice.

A jury convicted Richard Joseph Haddad of obscenity and assessed a six month jail sentence and a fine of $2000. In five points of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in: (1) not granting a mistrial during voir dire; (2) instructing the jury on the law of parties; (3) admitting explicit sexual videotapes; and (4) admitting extraneous offenses. Appellant also contends the evidence is insufficient to affirmatively connect him as a party to the offense.

We overrule appellant’s sufficiency point of error. Because we find the trial court should have granted…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  2. Pesina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  3. Woodall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Biagas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  5. Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API