Haddad v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MALONEY, Justice.
A jury convicted Richard Joseph Haddad of obscenity and assessed a six month jail sentence and a fine of $2000. In five points of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in: (1) not granting a mistrial during voir dire; (2) instructing the jury on the law of parties; (3) admitting explicit sexual videotapes; and (4) admitting extraneous offenses. Appellant also contends the evidence is insufficient to affirmatively connect him as a party to the offense.
We overrule appellant’s sufficiency point of error. Because we find the trial court should have granted…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Barnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Pesina v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
- Woodall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Biagas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Brown v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.