Legal Opinion

Stacey v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 12, 1927No. 27,215PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

This controversy presents the questions whether or not a senior mortgagee must make a junior mortgagee a party to foreclosure proceedings in order to bar the latter’s interest, whether ' the provisions of R. S. 60-3460, 60-3440 and 60-3441 limit the rights of a junior mortgagee who was not a party in foreclosure proceedings by his senior mortgagee, or whether, not having been a party to foreclosure proceedings, the interest of a junior mortgagee is affected thereby; also whether foreclosure of the senior mortgage and purchase of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Factors' & Traders' Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Howard v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Bradley v. ParkhurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  4. Williams v. BrickerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Fort Scott Building & Loan Ass'n v. Palatine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McFall v. FordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Garber v. Bankers' Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1928
  3. Motor Equipment Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Lenexa State Bank & Trust Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Beeler & Campbell Supply Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API