Philadelphia v. Brabender
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 307, Jan. T., 1901, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court affirming judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1900, No. 922, for plaintiff on case stated in suit of City of Philadelphia v. Edward Bra-bender. Appeal from Superior Court. The defendant was arrested for violating an ordinance of the city of Philadelphia, entitled: AN ORDINANCE.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 307, Jan. T., 1901, by defendant, from judgment of Superior Court affirming judgment of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1900, No. 922, for plaintiff on case stated in suit of City of Philadelphia v. Edward Bra-bender. Appeal from Superior Court. The defendant was arrested for violating an ordinance of the city of Philadelphia, entitled: AN ORDINANCE. To amend an ordinance entitled “ An Ordinance supplementary to an ordinance entitled ‘ An Ordinance relating to nuisances, approved September 23, 1864, approved the 7th day of March, A. D., 1882.’ ” Section 1. The Select and Common…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Rice of the Superior Court.
2Cited by37 opinions
- Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Wentz v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- City of Chicazgo v. RhineIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
- Duquesne City v. FinckeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Town of Green River v. BungerWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.