Pulice v. Collins, Unpublished Decision (8-3-2006)

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant, Michael Collins, challenges the trial court's vacating its nunc pro tunc entry amending an order that appellee, Denise Collins, repay an overpayment of child support.

{¶ 2} The parties in this case, appellant, Michael Collins, and appellee, Denise Collins, n.k.a. Pulice, were divorced in 1992. As a result of errors by CSEA and a change of custody of the minor children from Denise to Michael, Denise had received overpayments in child support from Michael. In 2002, Michael filed a motion with the trial court, properly served on Denise in compliance with…