Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ross-Meeham Foundry Co. v. Southern Car & Foundry Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided July 21, 1903No. 2,327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Bankruptcy. On petition for appointment of ancillary receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

On Saturday last I received the following telegram:

“Chattanooga, Tenn., July 18, 1903.
“Hon. E. S, Hammond, Memphis, Tenn. Bankruptcy petition against Southern Car and Foundry Co. filed in this district 4-45 July seventeenth receiver appointed by Judge Clark Nine forty five this morning Ancillary petition for your court will be mailed from here tonight.
“Henry O. Ewing, Clerk.”

Yesterday in due course of mail I received the following letter:

“Chattanooga, Tenn., July 18, 1903.
“Hon. E. S. Hammond, Judge U. S. Court, Memphis, Tenn. Dear Sir: We send you herewith papers in the matter of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. In re WilliamsDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1903
  4. Bardes v. Hawarden First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. In re KellyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dempster v. Waters Pierce Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  2. T. S. Faulk & Co. v. Steiner, Lobman & FrankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
  3. In re BenedictDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1905
  4. Scott v. GoodmanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1928
  5. In re Southwestern Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API