George v. Bridbord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of an alleged joint venture agreement, in which defendant has counterclaimed and interposed a third-party complaint for partition, the plaintiff, a professional corporation named Mary George, D.M.D. and Ralph Epstein, D.D.S., P. C., and the third-party defendants Mary George and Ralph Epstein, individually, appeal, as limited by their brief, (1) from stated portions of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), entered October 5, 1984, which, inter alia, incorporated the terms of an order dated March 19, 1984,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Klatz v. Armor Elevator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Deeb v. GoryebAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Levine v. GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- McPhillips v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Harper v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Chiang v. ChangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Grossman v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Lauriello v. GallottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Goldberger v. RudnickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.