Legal Opinion
Rose v. McCracken
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 18, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from Parker. Tried below before Hon. J. W. Patterson.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Associate Justice.
The conclusions of fact found by the District Court are adopted by us, and are as follows:
“1. I find that on August 26, 1892, the defendant, A. T. Rose, executed and delivered the note sued on, the same showing that it was made at Hillsboro, Texas, and thereafter the same was indorsed by Julia A. Rumage.and husband, J. D. Rumage, to the plaintiff, and that plaintiff is now the owner and holder thereof.
“2. That said note was given for part of the purchase money for the land described in plaintiff’s petition.
“3. That the note matured on the 1st of January, 1897; that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodworth v. President, Directors, & Co. of the Bank of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1821
- Britton v. NiccollsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Cox v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thompson v. KetchamNew York Supreme Court · 1809
3Cited by2 opinions
- O'Connor v. Kirby Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Harding v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927