Legal Opinion
Matheney v. Earl
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1881No. 8297PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.
This cause has been before in this court, when it was reversed for want of a sufficient complaint. See Earl v. Matheney, 60 Ind. 202. After it was remanded to the court below, the complaint was amended, and the defendants demurred to the amended complaint, and their demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff declining to plead further, there was final judgment against her upon demurrer. Me have, therefore, only to consider the question of the sufficiency of the amended complaint.
The complaint, as amended, stated that, on the 30th day of July, 1874, the defendants Adams Earl and Charles W. Bangs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parsons v. MilfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Earl v. MatheneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Briscoe v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Schoppenhast v. BollmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Wilkinson v. City of PeruIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gum-Elastic Roofing Co. v. Mexico Publishing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Debs v. DaltonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Over v. City of GreenfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ParishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.