Legal Opinion

Jacob Sampson v. Federal Republic of Germany and Claims Conference, Article 2 Fund

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 23, 2001No. 97-3555PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Jacob Sampson, pro se, sued Germany for his imprisonment in Nazi concentration camps, and sued Germany and the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, Inc. (“Claims Conference”) for reparations from funds created for Holocaust survivors. The district court dismissed the complaint concluding that Germany was immune from suit and that Sampson lacked standing to sue the Claims Conference. Sampson appeals. We affirm.

I

Sampson’s complaint alleges horrors which are beyond belief, and the evils he describes cannot be condemned in strong enough terms. 1 In 1939,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Holocaust Victims of v. Magyar Nemzeti BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Flomo v. Firestone Nat. Rubber Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Yimmi Bellaizac-HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  5. Peterson, John W. v. Royal Kingdom ArabiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API