Legal Opinion

Stenson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1931No. 21534PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBkoyles, C. J.

1. “The words ‘or otherwise dispose of’ in the first section of the act of December 13, 1871, entitled ‘an act to make penal the selling of personal property which has been mortgaged as a security for the payment of a debt,’ etc., must be construed to mean a disposition of the property in the nature of a sale and not in any other manner.” Conley v. State, 85 Ga. 348 (11) (11 S. E. 659), Scott v. State, 6 Ga. App. 332, 334 (64 S. E. 1005), and cit.

2. In the instant case the evidence showed that the mortgaged property (a sow) had been disposed of by being killed and eaten by the mortgagor (the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Linder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hester v. ShrouderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API