Legal Opinion

In re Weisberger

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1930No. 5860PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

The discharge of the bankrupt is opposed on two grounds, the first of which is as follows:

“First. The said bankrupt concealed or failed to keep books of account or records from which his financial condition and business transactions might he ascertained.”

The special master to whom tho specifications were referred recommends that the specifications of objection to the bankrupt’s discharge be sustained and the discharge of the bankrupt be denied. The bankrupt excepts to the report of the special master as not being sustained by the evidence.

On February 20-, 1928, an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. In re Simon & SternbergDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1907
  4. In re WeinerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1928
  5. In re AmsterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re LeichterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  2. In re StineDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1945
  3. In re Richenell Fabric Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. In re StacksDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API