Legal Opinion

MATTER OF SORLI v. Coveney

New York Court of Appeals

Decided August 28, 1980PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

Petitioner commenced this proceeding by an order to show cause. Although the order required that service be effected on or before August 7, 1980, service was not completed until the next day at the earliest. Inasmuch as petitioner failed to follow the provisions for service specified in the order to show cause, the petition must be dismissed (see Matter of Bruno v Ackerson, 39 NY2d 718).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bruno v. AckersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. El Greco Society of Visual Arts, Inc. v. DiamantidisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Frederick v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Zaretski v. TutunjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Keith X. v. Kristin Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. State v. Robert C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API