Legal Opinion

Grajeda v. Aramark Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 28, 2006No. 94,051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, j,:

Aramark Corporation (Aramark) and Bankers Standard Insurance (Bankers) appeal the decision of the Workers Compensation Board (Board) to remand Evangelina Grajeda’s lump sum settlement award to the administrative law judge (ALJ) for further consideration. Aramark and Bankers claim the Board lacked jurisdiction to review Grajeda’s settlement award. They further claim that even if the Board had jurisdiction to consider Grajeda’s appeal, the settlement hearing complied with the provisions of tire Workers Compensation Act and the Board should have approved the settlement.

When this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. Labette Community College v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. In re the Estate of WolfSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. In re the Estate of WolfCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  5. Williams v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Langvardt v. Innovative Livestock Svcs.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API