McManaman v. Hinchley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Steele county to foreclose a mortgage. The case was tried before Buckham, J., who found in favor of plaintiff. From a judgment entered pursuant to the findings, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to foreclose a real-estate mortgage. Plaintiff had judgment in the court below, and defendants appeal.
The facts are as follows: On July 15, 1879, plaintiff sold and conveyed to defendants the real property described in the com*297plaint; and in part payment therefor’defendants made and delivered to plaintiff their two certain promissory notes, for the sum of $500 each, to secure the payment of which they executed to plaintiff the mortgage sought to be foreclosed. One of such promissory notes became due and payable July 15, 1880, and the other July 15, 1881. Several payments were made on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re the Estate of JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Oster v. MickleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Lewis v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1862
- Phelps v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
- Blumenthal v. JassoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- Atwood v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Williamson v. FalkenhagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Welbon v. WebsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- First Nat. Bank of Goodwin v. Marshall State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.