Legal Opinion
State v. Cox
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 29, 1977No. 1873-3PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMunson, C.J.
Defendant was found guilty of one count of grand larceny (RCW 9.54.010(2)) and one count of unlawful sale of securities (RCW 21.20.010). 1 He now challenges: the sufficiency of the evidence on each count, several of the court's instructions, and the failure to give several proposed instructions. We affirm.
A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence admits the truth of the evidence of the party against whom the challenge is made and all inferences reasonably drawn therefrom and further requires that the evidence be interpreted most strongly against the challenger and in a light most…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Manor Nursing Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Richard Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- State v. GosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Parrent v. Midwest Rug Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Hentzner v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. BlairSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.