Legal Opinion

State v. Provens, 2007-Ca-00034 (8-4-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 2008No. 2007-CA-00034Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This Court is re-opening appellant's case in order to consider the motion filed by appellant Armone Tiras Provens to re-open his direct appeal pursuant to App. R. 26(B).

{¶ 2} On April 14, 2008, this Court upheld appellant's conviction and sentence on one count of reckless homicide with a firearm specification. See, State v. Provens, 5th Dist. No. 2007-CA-00034.

{¶ 3} App. R. 26 (B) states:

{¶ 4} (B) Application for reopening:

{¶ 5} (1) A defendant in a criminal case may apply for reopening of the appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence, based on a claim of ineffective…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API