State v. Murray
Supreme Court of Georgia
1DissentMelton, Justice
This Court’s jurisdiction is strictly limited by our state’s constitution. In its opinion, the majority judicially rewrites our constitutionally-mandated jurisdiction to include the present case. Because this Court lacks the authority to edit our constitutional jurisdiction in this way, I must respectfully dissent, as I did to the original order which is now being vacated.7
The record shows that, on October 6, 2009, the trial court issued an oral order finding Assistant District Attorney Linda Dunikoski in contempt of court and ordering her to pay a $100 fine for violating certain agreed-upon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Waits v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Dowdy v. PalmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- In Re PaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Holmes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.