Natvik v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
574 So.2d 1230 (1991)
Roy NATVIK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 90-856.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
February 28, 1991.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Paolo G. Annino, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
GRIFFIN, Judge.
We affirm the lower court. However, in accordance with Flowers v. State, 567 So.2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we certify to the supreme court the following question:
DO FLORIDA'S UNIFORM SENTENCING GUIDELINES…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flowers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Worley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Doughty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Ficichy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Howarth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Isom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.