Panstwowe Zaklady Graviozne v. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the CourtThacher, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This action is here upon removal from the state court pursuant to petition of defendant insurance company. When the petition was filed, a motion made by defendant railroad company to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction of the subject of the action was pending in the state court. This motion has now been renewed in this court.
Jurisdiction of the person of the defendant is not questioned. , The objection is that the court should not entertain jurisdiction of the subject of the action: First, because under the state practice the state court would…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Summerall v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Jablonski v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Ceravit Corp. AG v. Black Diamond Steamship Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
- Harnischfeger Sale Corporation v. Sternberg Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934