Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grover W. Harris v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1993No. 91-1215Published

1DissentSprouse, Senior Circuit Judge

The questions on this appeal are whether the ALJ used the appropriate standard and based his decision on substantial evidence when he denied Harris’s black lung benefits. Nothing in the majority’s opinion dispels my belief that the ALJ’s decision on both grounds was erroneous. Consequently, I respectfully dissent.

I

To begin with, I disagree with the inclusion of certain factors in the standard the majority adopts for determining whether a claimant’s job is “comparable” to his former work as a coal miner under 20 C.F.R. § 727.-203(b)(1). If the reach of the decision were confined to this case,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Elizabeth J. HAMMOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Ellen L. Jones v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Dennis Howell v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API