Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a preference.

1Opinion of the CourtDtjgro, J.

This is a motion for a preference upon the ground that the action is for libel. As the complaint contains no statement of falsity or malice, the defendants question it as for libel. In my opinion it is not necessary to plead either falsity or malice in an- action for libel. Falsity and malice are both presumed from the publication of defamatory matter. Falsity need not be alleged, as truth is a defense and cannot be shown unless pleaded. To say that a defendant maliciously published (aside from any. claim of what is generally called actual malice) is merely to assert that he published without…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API