Legal Opinion

Lundquist v. West

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment for damages suffered in an intersection collision, and the defendant appeals. The same litigation has been in this court before. Lundquist v. Irvine, 243 Or 274, 413 P2d 416 (1966).

The defendant’s principal assignment of error attacks an instruction that the defendant was guilty of negligence as a matter of law in failing to signal her intent to turn her automobile into the path of the plaintiff’s automobile and that such “negligence was a proximate cause of the collision.”

The defendant admitted that she had not made a turn signal. The collision occurred at a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Babler Bros. v. Pacific Inter-Mountain Express Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lundquist v. IrvineOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osborne v. HayOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. TorreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API