Legal Opinion

Current, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1994No. A061750PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HODGE, J. *

In Nat. Bellas Hess v. Dept, of Revenue (1967) 386 U.S. 753 [18 L.Ed.2d 505, 87 S.Ct. 1389] (Bellas Hess), and again in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota By and Through Heitkamp (1992) 504 U.S._[119 L.Ed.2d 91, 112 S.Ct. 1904] (Quill), the United States Supreme Court determined that the commerce clause of the United States Constitution precludes imposition of a use tax upon an out-of-state mail-order firm whose only connection with customers of the taxing state was by common carrier or United States mail.

Respondent Current, Inc. (Current) is an out-of-state mail-order company…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. National Geographic Society v. California Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  2. Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Rodriguez v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
  4. St. Tammany Parish Tax Collector v. Barnesandnoble.ComDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API