Current, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HODGE, J. *
In Nat. Bellas Hess v. Dept, of Revenue (1967) 386 U.S. 753 [18 L.Ed.2d 505, 87 S.Ct. 1389] (Bellas Hess), and again in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota By and Through Heitkamp (1992) 504 U.S._[119 L.Ed.2d 91, 112 S.Ct. 1904] (Quill), the United States Supreme Court determined that the commerce clause of the United States Constitution precludes imposition of a use tax upon an out-of-state mail-order firm whose only connection with customers of the taxing state was by common carrier or United States mail.
Respondent Current, Inc. (Current) is an out-of-state mail-order company…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Geographic Society v. California Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pantoja v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Citicorp North America, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Rodriguez v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- St. Tammany Parish Tax Collector v. Barnesandnoble.ComDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2007