Legal Opinion

Oil Trading Associates, Inc. v. Texas City Refining, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 15, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion pursuant to Rule 56 (b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. for partial summary judgment dismissing the first claim set forth in the complaint on the ground that there is no genuine issue of any material fact as to said claim and that defendant is entitled to judgment dismissing the claim as a matter of law.

The complaint contains ten causes of action, only the first of which concerns *830us here. This cause of action alleges that the parties entered into a written contract, dated May 1, 1952, a copy of which is annexed to the complaint, where-under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Hubbs & Hastings Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Beech Aircraft Corporation v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  3. Finch v. King Solomon Lodge No. 60Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Royce Haulage Corp. v. Bronx Terminal Garage, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945
  5. Smith v. United Traction & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. Burton, Parsons & Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API