Legal Opinion

Nguyen v. Aldrich

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2013No. 59597Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ruling on a trial de novo request for an abuse of discretion. Casino Properties, Inc. v. Andrews, 112 Nev. 132, 135-36,

911 P.2d 1181, 1183

(1996). Having reviewed the briefs and appendices on appeal, we conclude that the district court incorrectly dismissed appellant's trial de novo request based on the failure to pay the jury fees. NSTR 4(a)(1) requires the payment of "applicable juror fees." As argued by appellant, he did not seek a jury trial in his request for a trial de novo. Respondent likewise did not file a demand for a jury trial. Therefore, no jury fees were necessary in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Casino Properties, Inc. v. AndrewsNevada Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API