Ciesmelewski v. Domalewski
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Garrison, J.
This was an action for slander tried before the District Court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the defendant. Upon this appeal the plaintiff contends 'that it was error to admit the testimony of one Krzysicki. Why the testimony of this witness was inadmissible is not stated in the brief or suggested by the two cases cited. The witness was called by the appellant and his cross-examination as to his relation to the parties and his interest in the case was entirely proper.
The other point argued is that plaintiff was not permitted to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Pizzella v. PichardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933