Legal Opinion

United States v. Edwards

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 7, 2013No. Criminal No. 2011-0129PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendant Gezo Edwards’ [745, 746] Pro Se Motion for New Trial and Renewed Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Interception of Wired Communication. The Court previously denied four motions from the Defendant to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a court-ordered wiretap interception of three cellular telephones purportedly operated by co-Defendant William Bowman. 1 As with his prior motions, the Defendant’s present motion argues that in obtaining a wiretap on Defendant Bowman’s cellular telephone…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Carter, ReginaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Robert Mitchell, Iii, United States of America v. Lawrence John Sposato, United States of America v. Richard AndradaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Henry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. United States v. EdwardsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API