Lachomette v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the Commercial Court of New Orleans, Watts, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.
The defendant and appellant P. F. Thomas, is sought to be made liable for $2472 77, the balance of an account current between the plaintiff, and the late firm of Tissot & Pilloton, of which it is alleged that he was a dormant partner. The defence, besides the general issue, is, that P. F. Thomas was not a dormant partner, but a partner, in commendam, of the said firm, and that he is not liable tobe sued in the manner and form set forth in the petition ; that the partnership has been dissolved, and that a settlement was made between its members on the 26th of September, 1840 ; that after its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nott & Co. v. DoumingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- Offutt v. BredloveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
- Jacobs v. BogartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1844
- Nicholls v. RolandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1822
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Nereide, Bennett, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Carrington and Others v. THE MERCHANTS'INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1834
- Ray's Appliance, Etc. v. K & D EnterprisesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Stewart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1864
- Dupre v. RichardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.