Legal Opinion
Capital Properties v. City of Providence, 97-4199 (2001)
Superior Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 6, 2001No. C.A. No. PC 97-4199, C.A. No. PC 98-5202, C.A. No. PC 99-4974, C.A. No. PC 98-6254Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
After granting Capital Properties, Inc.'s ("CPI" or "Plaintiff") Motion for Costs and Attorney's Fees and denying City of Providence's ("City" or "Defendant") Cross-Motions to Vacate Judgments, this Court asked CPI to provide a detailed accounting of its fees and costs in support of said motion. A detailed history of the facts and travel of this case can be found in Capital Properties, Inc. v. City of Providence, et al., 2000 WL 1910088 (R.I. Super. 2000) and Capital Properties, Inc. v. State,749 A.2d 1069, 1085 (R.I. 1999).
Calculating Attorney's Fees
The determination of an award of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Capital Properties, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- Colonial Plumbing & Heating Supply Co. v. Contemporary Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Ciulla v. RignyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.