Legal Opinion

Bertucci v. Cappell

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1916No. 6645Published

Appeal from the 'Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “B,” No. 113,120. Honorable F. D. King, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

His Honor, CHARLES F. CLAIBORNE,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

This is a concursus proceeding under Act 221 of 1914, p. 418.

Plaintiff alleges that on February 6th, 1915, she made a written contract with defendants, Cappell and Gordon, by which they were to erect upon a portion of ground owned by her a building for the price of $1,600, payable in four installments of $400 each; that the said contractors furnished as bondsmen in solido, Widow Lee Franklin, Margaret Franklin and Ethel Franklin, wife of Henry Allen, for the amount of $900.00; that said contract and bond…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slocomb v. RobertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  2. McCay v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. M'Cready v. FreedlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  4. State ex rel. Mt. Calvary M. E. Church v. St. PaulSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Griggs v. VermilyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API