Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 13, 1993No. 91-04059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

James Earl Williams appeals from his conviction for robbery and the sentence imposed following the revocation of his probation. We affirm the jury’s guilty verdict but we remand this matter to the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect a conviction for robbery, not armed robbery. Williams also claims that the trial court exceeded the sentencing guidelines by departing two cells upward from the presumptive range. We disagree and affirm.

In 1990, upon convictions for burglary and attempted burglary, Williams received five years of probation consecutive to a two year prison…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Manuel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Holloman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Coleman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. TERRY E. HUDSON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API