Legal Opinion

Prinz v. Borough of Paramus

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 8, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

The prosecutrix seems to have applied to the mayor and borough council of the borough of Paramus for the renewal of a license to keep and maintain a dog kennel for the breeding and sale of dogs, on certain premises leased by her in the borough, although her application is not reproduced before us nor are we otherwise informed as to its rtrecise terms and contents.

The application was denied because the premises in and on which the proposed kennel was to be conducted did not comply with the regulatory provisions of section 10 of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gilman v. NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Clary v. Borough of EatontownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Michaels v. Twp. Comm. of the Twp. of PembertonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Howell Twp. v. SagorodnyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. The N.T. Hegeman Co. v. Mayor, Etc., River EdgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API