Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bunch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1973No. Appeal, No. 151PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Nix,

The appellant was charged and indicted for the murder of his paramour, Dora Grant and her eight-year old child, Nathan Grant. After trial by jury, in which appellant contended that he was intoxicated and/or insane at the time of the killings, a verdict of murder in the first degree on both indictments was returned. The court en banc dismissed motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment and a life sentence on each indictment was imposed to run concurrently. Appellant how appeals to this Court.

During the course of the trial appellant took the stand and on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. HellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Commonwealth v. FestaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BunchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. RyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. McGonigleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API