Legal Opinion

Ball & Socket Fastener Co. v. C. A. Edgarton Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 26, 1899No. 262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. This was a suit in equity by the Ball & Socket Fastener Company against the C. A. Edgarton Manufacturing Company for alleged infringement of letters patent No. 412,296, issued October 8, 1889, to W. S. Richardson, for improvements in fastenings for gloves and other articles.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This suit relates to a patent, of October 18,1889, to William Streeter Richardson, for improvements in fastenings for gloves and other articles. The specification describes the invention as relating to constructing the ball and socket members of the device, and to fastening the same'in place. We must apprehend (hat, though some of the advances in this art are, on their face, trivial, yet a careful examination will show that the art is a difficult and important one. Fastenings of this character are in extensive demand for various purposes, — gloves, corsets, clothing,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Krementz v. S. Cottle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Boston & R. Electric St. Ry. Co. v. Bemis Car-Box Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1897
  3. Masten v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1893
  4. Masten v. HuntU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Peg-Wood, Shank & Leather Board Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
  2. Nutter v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API