Legal Opinion

Select Insurance Company v. Patton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1974No. 8424PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

On the strength of the jury’s findings in this workmen’s compensation case, judgment was rendered that plaintiff Janice W. Patton sustained, and should recover from defendant Select Insurance Company for, total and permanent disability as a result of a July 29, 1970 injury. Defendant, the workman’s compensation carrier for Straus-Frank Company of Amarillo, has marshalled a thirty-point attack on the judgment. None of the points presents reversible error. Affirmed.

Janice Patton had been employed at Straus-Frank Company for the majority of seven years prior to July 29, 1970.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Olson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Walker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Solomon v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beago v. CeresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Wyar, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  3. INA of Texas v. Howeth, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Jones v. Illinois Employers Insurance of Wausau, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2004
  5. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. La RochelleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API