Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Marshall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 18, 1912No. Gen. No. 16,548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles N. Goodnow, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

Plaintiff Carlson, a real estate broker, employed King, who had been employed by Hart, another broker. Defendant Marshall listed with Hart for sale certain real estate. King, while in the employment of plaintiff, called on defendant, told him that he was working for plaintiff attempting to secure a purchaser for defendant’s real estate, and had taken Burkland to see the premises. Defendant and Burkland then went to plaintiff’s office and plaintiff told defendant that he would hold him for a commission of $112.50 if he sold said real estate to Burkland. He afterwards sold the real estate- to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Rockford, Rock Island & St. Louis Railroad v. WilcoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Barber v. KochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arthur Rubloff & Co. v. Drovers National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Daley v. G'sellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. City Builders Finance Co. v. StahlSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API