Legal Opinion

AMELKIN v. McCLURE

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 30, 1999No. 96-5942Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

168 F.3d 893

27 Media L. Rep. 1577

Stephen AMELKIN, Broadway Chiropractic; Dr. Brian

Christopher Fee; Stuart Lyon; Nicolas Baker; David

Kaplan; James W. Chambers; Sidney Hanish; Rhoda Daniels;

Thomas H. Watson; Kenneth W. Wall; James Bogard, doing

business as Bogard & Associates, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

City of Louisville, Division of Police, Plaintiff,

v.

Ann McCLURE, Document Custodian; Gary Rose, Commissioner of

Department of State Police; Ben Chandler,

Attorney General, Defendants-Appellants,

Justice Cabinet, Department of State Police,

Plaintiff/Counter Defendant-Appellant,

Jefferson County, Kentucky,…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Gilman; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Edenfield v. FaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API