Legal Opinion

Randall Weidner v. James H. Thieret, Warden, Menard Correctional Facility, and Roland W. Burris, Attorney General of the State of Illinois

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 13, 1991No. 90-2024PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Randall Weidner, a state prisoner, seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on the admission at his criminal trial of what he claims was an involuntary confession. In a prior opinion, this Court remanded Weid-ner’s petition to the district court with instructions relating to the gathering of evidence concerning the state trial court’s ruling that Weidner’s confession was voluntary. After complying with these instructions, the district court again denied Weid-ner’s petition. Because our prior instructions are the law of the case, and because none of the exceptions to the law of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. CeballosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Arthur Theodore Towne Dane Joseph TreiberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Steve Shore v. Warden, Stateville PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Larry Watson v. George E. DetellaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. In Re AntrobusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API