Legal Opinion

(HC) Grayson v. Sacramento County Main Jail

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00996Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZIQUAN S. GRAYSON, No. 2:24-cv-0996 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER and 14 SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMNEDATION 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a county prisoner proceeding without an attorney, who has filed a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. This matter is before the court for preliminary review under 19 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases. 20 I. Screening Standard 21 In screening the habeas petition, the court applies the Rule 4 framework of the Rules…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Ramirez v. GalazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API