State v. Chappelle
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STEELMAN, Judge.
Where the State presented substantial evidence of each element of arson, the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motions to dismiss. Testimony that the victim of the arson refused to agree to allow defendant to store stolen goods in her home was relevant to show defendant’s motive to burn the premises. The trial court did not err in allowing defendant to dismiss counsel over tactical differences and represent himself after a thorough colloquy demonstrating that his waiver of his right to counsel was knowing and voluntary. The prosecutor’s closing argument…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MarinoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. YountsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.