Legal Opinion

Yancey Brothers Co. v. Dehco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 8, 1964No. 40380PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

The petition brought for the 2W scraper was not subject to general demurrer.

In response to defendant’s motion for new trial on the general grounds, the plaintiff advances two theories as to why its recovery should be allowed to stand. They are: (a) that, under the circumstances, the defendant is estopped to rely on the misdescription in serial numbers, and (b) that the description in the recorded bill of sale to secure debt was sufficient, under the circumstances, to create a jury question as to the constructive notice imparted to defendant by its recordation.

Estoppel.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Nussbaum v. Waterman & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Gay v. Laurens CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Williams v. WaldropSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Paradies & Rich v. Warren Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Plemens v. Diddeglaser, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. United States v. Big Z WarehouseDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1970
  3. Kornegay v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Peoples Bank v. Northwest Georgia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. United States v. Zac A. Crittenden, Jr. D/B/A Crittenden Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API