Legal Opinion

Clark v. Clark

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1935No. 6271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

The parties to this action are husband and wife. The husband is, and prior to their marriage was, sole owner of a farm in Ada County which is mortgaged to secure the payment of a debt now past due and, at the time the action was commenced, foreclosure of the mortgage was threatened. He made application for a loan to the Federal Land Bank of Spokane with which to pay the debt and the application was approved, but before the loan was made his wife, appellant herein, filed a declaration of homestead on the land, and has refused, and still refuses, to join in the execution of a mortgage or to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fitzell v. LeakyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Simonson v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. McPhee v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Paxton & Gallagher v. SuttonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Barton v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Clark v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API