Legal Opinion

Sargent Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 11, 1913No. 1179PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 31833 (T. D. 33304).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

In this case, which is submitted without oral argument by either party, it appears from the record that certain plain white porcelain crucibles, about 2 inches in diameter at the top and about 1 inch in height, were assessed for duty at 55 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 94 of the tariff act of 1909. They are claimed by the importers' to be dutiable as earthenware crucibles under paragraph 92 of the *463same act at 25 per cent ad valorem. No evidence whatever, except a sample of the merchandise, wak offered to support the protest, and the question here is purely one of law.

The material part…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy & Stevenson (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API