Legal Opinion · Dissent

Columbus Park Housing Corp. v. City of Kenosha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2003No. 02-0699Published

1Dissent

SHIRLEYS. ÁBRAHAMSON, C.J.

¶ 47. 0dissentin-g). Applying a strict but reasonable interpretation to tax exemption statutes,1 I would affirm the decision of the court of appeals and the judgment of the circuit court. I dissent because the majority opinion's approach is more strict than reasonable.

¶ 48. The issue in this case is whether Columbus Park Housing Corp., a not-for-profit benevolent housing association, is entitled to a tax exemption under Wis. Stat. § 70.11(4). The City of Kenosha stipulated that Columbus Park is a benevolent association within the meaning of § 70.11(4). Indeed, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. City of Madison v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. DelaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Redevelopment Authority of Green Bay v. Bee Frank, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API