Columbus Park Housing Corp. v. City of Kenosha
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
SHIRLEYS. ÁBRAHAMSON, C.J.
¶ 47. 0dissentin-g). Applying a strict but reasonable interpretation to tax exemption statutes,1 I would affirm the decision of the court of appeals and the judgment of the circuit court. I dissent because the majority opinion's approach is more strict than reasonable.
¶ 48. The issue in this case is whether Columbus Park Housing Corp., a not-for-profit benevolent housing association, is entitled to a tax exemption under Wis. Stat. § 70.11(4). The City of Kenosha stipulated that Columbus Park is a benevolent association within the meaning of § 70.11(4). Indeed, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- DeMars v. LaPourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Madison v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. DelaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Redevelopment Authority of Green Bay v. Bee Frank, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.