Legal Opinion

Wright v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 20, 1994No. 2196PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

James W. Wright brought this suit against United Parcel Service, Inc. (hereinafter UPS) and Bill Thomas alleging, among other causes of action, false arrest and malicious prosecution. UPS and Thomas moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP to dismiss Wright’s complaint on the ground, among others, that all its causes of action were preempted by the Labor Management Relations (Taft-Hartley) Act § 301, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (1988) (hereinafter the LMRA). The circuit court dismissed Wright’s complaint. Wright appeals. His appeal concerns only the dismissal of his causes of action for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Butts v. AVX CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Shramek v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. Nash v. AT&T NASSAU METALSSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Palmetto State Medical Center, Inc. v. Operation LifelineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Palmetto State Medical Center, Inc. v. LifelineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API