T.J. v. Calhoun County Department of Human Resources
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1DissentThompson, Presiding Judge
I believe that the juvenile court could have properly determined that the children were dependent based on the totality of the evidence presented to it. § 12-15-102(8), Ala.Code 1975; A.L.D. v. Calhoun Cnty. Dep’t of Human Res., 2 So.3d 855, 861 (Ala.Civ.App.2008) (“The trial court ‘must also consider the best interests of the child and may find dependency based on the totality of the circumstances.’ J.M. v. State Dep’t of Human Res., 686 So.2d 1253, 1255 (Ala.Civ.App.1996).”); Ex parte State Dep’t of Human Res., 890 So.2d 114, 120 (Ala.2004) (same). The evidence in this action, including…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte BryowskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- J.S.M. v. P.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
- Lilly v. PalmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Ex Parte State Dept. of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.