Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Galindo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1959No. 13541PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The trial court temporarily enjoined Adolfo and Amoldo Garcia from closing a road which leads to Francisco Villarreal’s ranch. The Garcias, appellants, argue that the trial court erred in applying the law to the undisputed facts. We find the facts are disputed, and that the trial court effectively maintained the status quo.

The Villarreal ranch is known in this record as Share Six. The Garcias claim Share Seven, which is directly to the east of Share Six. Fidela Garcia Galindo, one of the appellees, claims title to Share Seven, but we do not consider that issue important in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. E. Weinstein & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garcia v. GalindoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API