Legal Opinion
Dunklee v. Kettering
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 13, 1950No. 16426PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays
In this proceeding, we are called upon to interpret the following clause contained in the will of Harriet F. Dunklee, deceased:
“I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate to my friend C. E. Kettering in trust nevertheless for the following purposes:
“1. Upon my death, provided Dr. George K. Dunklee of San Luis Obispo, California, is then living, that said trustee pay the entire income of my estate to him during his lifetime. I further authorize my said trustee to use as much of the principal of my estate, in addition to said income, as may be necessary to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of the Manufacturers National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Stempel v. Middletown Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Bridgeport-City Trust Co. v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Peckham v. LegoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Hull v. HollowaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Godfrey v. ChandleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- In Re the Marriage of MohrlangColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mitchell v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- Winkel v. StreicherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Bregel v. Julier & BondCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.